Chapter 14
PURSUING
BALANCED REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
The differences in incidence of poverty across regions reflect disparities
in their access to, and use of economic resources. The National Capital
Region (NCR) or Metro Manila has the lowest poverty incidence in the
country. Yet, the quality of life in the NCR is challenged by problems
associated with extreme congestion due to migration from other regions.
The
government adopts a four-pronged approach to balancing the development
of regions across the country. Urban centers outside of Metro Manila
shall be developed. Metro Manila shall also be decongested by attracting
communities towards Subic-Clark, and Calabarzon. To facilitate balanced
regional development, capacity of local government units (LGUs) in attracting
local and foreign investors will be enhanced. Capacity-building programs
will be designed to enable them to practice greater fiscal discipline
and improve revenue collections. These will also be geared toward enhancing
the credit worthiness of the LGUs and give them access to the capital
markets. To enhance planning and discipline in the use of scarce resources,
a well-coordinated statistical system at the local level will be established.
POLICY
FRAMEWORK
Regional
development seeks to reduce the disparity between Metro Manila and the
rest of the regions. Urban centers in various parts of the country will
be encouraged to grow so that they could be attractive investment sites
and catalyze growth in the regions. At the same time, population and
activities in the NCR which are at present overconcentrated will be
dispersed by attracting communities to the Subic-Clark area and the
Calabarzon.
LGUs
will assume vital roles in stimulating the regional and local economy.
Their capacities in planning, investment programming and fund management
and mobilization will be enhanced so that local executives can become
dynamic economic managers rather than mere administrators. Management
capability-building programs will be designed to enable them to undertake
the appropriate actions on every opportunity or problem in their areas.
National government will support local planning, policy making and program
development by initiating the establishment of technology-supported
local statistical database for effective decision making.
ASSESSMENT
AND CHALLENGES
Disparities
in Levels of Development Among Regions
A
large proportion of the country’s population and economic activities has
been concentrated in the NCR which accounted for about 30 percent of gross
domestic product (GDP) from 1997 to 2000 (Table
14.1). Its two adjoining regions, Regions III and IV have the next
largest shares to GDP. In terms of population density, NCR’s 15,600 persons/sq.km.
is about
60 times the national average.
Social
indicators also show large disparities among regions. Poverty incidence
is lowest in the NCR and highest in the Autonomous Region of Muslim
Mindanao (ARMM). Luzon regions are generally better off than those in
the Visayas and Mindanao. The level of development as measured by the
human development index is generally higher in Luzon, except for some
provinces in the Cordilera Administrative Region (CAR) and Region V.
Again, the level of human development is lowest in ARMM.
Addressing
the Costs of Rapid Urbanization
Large
concentrations of population due to high urban fertility and rural-urban
migration rates has accelerated urbanization. More than half of the
Philippine population is classified as urban, about one third of which
is in the NCR. While its large population is a factor that contributes
to NCR’s economic strength, it has also strained the metropolitan environment
and its ability to meet the service and infrastructure requirements
of its constituents.
Metro
Manila and, to a lesser degree, other large urban centers are confronted
with problems associated with rapid urbanization such as inadequate
infrastructure, pollution, and traffic congestion and the proliferation
of informal settlements. Urban areas, if managed properly could flourish
as centers of trade, tourism, science and technology. The challenge
therefore is managing their continued growth, improving their service
capabilities and rehabilitating their environments without compromising
efficiency.
Limited
Resources to Finance Local Development
Decentralization
and local autonomy present greater opportunities for LGUs to expand
local community participation in the development process, improve the
delivery of services, infrastructure and facilities at the local level.
Increasing demand for local services and infrastructure particularly
in urban areas has put pressure on LGUs to generate the necessary financial
requirements. However, many LGUs, especially those belonging to low-income
classes rely heavily on their internal revenue allotment (IRA) to finance
basic amenities and infrastructure. In many cases however, these are
not sufficient. LGUs should, therefore, be able to exercise creativity
and innovation in finding alternative sources of funds and mobilization
schemes to support their programs and projects.
STRATEGIES
Development
of Urban Centers Outside Metro Manila
This
strategy calls for a dispersed but closely integrated system of urban
centers. Urban centers outside Metro Manila must be encouraged to grow
so that they can become attractive investment destinations and alternatives
to the NCR. At the same time, as regional cities accommodate a larger
share of the country’s population, local governments are better able
to manage the development of larger and more environmentally constrained
metropolitan centers.
Growth
networks that have been established in various parts of the country
such as the North Philippines consisting of Regions I, II, III and CAR,
the Cavite-Laguna-Batangas-Rizal-Quezon (Calabarzon) Corridor, Legaspi-Iriga-Naga
Growth Network, Cagayan de Oro-Iligan Corridor (CIC), and the South
Cotabato-Sultan Kudarat-Sarangani-General Santos (Sosksargen) growth
area, will provide opportunities for greater collaboration among regions,
LGUs and business groups. This approach would also optimize the use
of resources and promote complementation in local development strategies.
The
provision of physical infrastructures that will link different parts
of the country is essential to the development of the regions. These
are needed to spread out economic activities by increasing access to
alternative product sources, markets and services. Providing greater
opportunities in other provinces and cities will also attract people
from Metro Manila. Apart from attaining of economic objectives, improving
physical linkages will promote stronger social and cultural ties among
various regions of the country.
Decongesting
and Managing Metro Manila
Metro
Manila will be decongested by attracting communities northwards to Subic-Clark
and southwards to Calabarzon and Batangas Port. This will be achieved
not by demolishing shanties but by building commuter and transport systems
to entice families to voluntary relocate. In line with this, transportation
networks that will link major industrial centers will be improved. This
includes the Subic-Clark Toll Road and the Southern Tagalog Arterial
Road.
As
a parallel effort, the current problems of Metro Manila will be managed
effectively. Within 2001, the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA)
will launch a solid waste management program that includes the following:
1.
Establishment of waste segregation facilities in Las Pinas, Manggahan
in Pasig City, Smokey Mountain and Valenzuela City;
2.
Market waste reduction program to be piloted in EDSA Central, Farmers,
Divisoria, Paco and Pasig Markets; and
3.
Negotiation for the establishment of new sanitary landfills.
Furthermore,
traffic will be reduced through the completion of five lines of the
mass transit system between 2004-2006. In addition, traffic management
will involve the following immediate measures:
1.
Increasing the number of PNP traffic personnel for the Traffic Enforcement
Group-NCR to 1,200 and the Traffic Management Group -NCR to 600;
2.
Recruitment of 500 MMDA traffic officers with stringent qualification
requirements;
3.
Full operationalization of a traffic command center linked to 20 closed
circuit TV cameras;
4.
Completion of the upgrading and rehabilitation of 419 signalized intersections;
5.
Establishment of clearways/ expressways in the areas of A. Bonifacio
Avenue, Commonwealth Avenue, Roxas Boulevard and EDSA;
6.
Minor Geometric Improvements at President Quirino/North Zamora and President
Quirino Avenue and Pedro Gil Street;
7.
Establishment of Inter-Modal Central Terminals at FTI, Camachile and
PEA reclamation area; and
8.
Small Scale Traffic Improvement Measures (SSTRIM) in Metro Manila in
the intersections of Shaw/Lee Road/Wack Wack/Old Wack Wack, Montillano/Manila
South National Road, MacArthur with Karuhatan and A. Pablo, Gen. Santos
Avenue with the East Service Road, Canaynay Avenue with Dr. A. Santos
Avenue.
Over
the medium term, the following management and engineering programs shall
be implemented:
1.
Traffic management measures that will include the following:
a
modified bus segregation scheme;
b
establishment of round the clock truck routes; and
c
formulation of guidelines on the queuing at bus stops;
2.
Establishment of a traffic engineering and management unit under the
Traffic Operations Center;
3.
Establishment of central terminals at key entry points of the metropolis
with the capacity for intermodal systems in Balintawak, FTI and Coastal
Road;
4.
Establishment of computer-based traffic control system (State of the
Art Metro Manila Adaptive and Responsive Traffic Signal System or SMART)
in 419 intersections in Metro Manila;
5.
Improvement and/or construction of facilities to ease movement of pedestrians
and ensure their safety;
6.
Issuance of guidelines on roadworks and management and the corresponding
monitoring and implementation;
7.
Establishment of additional dedicated express lanes in selected areas
such as those being pilot tested in A. Bonifacio Avenue, Commonwealth
Avenue, Roxas Boulevard and EDSA;
8.
Upgrading and construction of roads along major traffic corridors;
9.
Implementation of education and information programs for drivers and
traffic management personnel; and
10.
Enhancement of administrative support systems for traffic management
and enforcement, including the decentralization of traffic adjudication
and computerization of redemption centers.
These
programs shall be designed and coordinated in accordance with a land
use plan that promotes efficient use of existing land supply and infrastructures
and the orderly development of the metropolis.
Enhancing
LGUs’ Roles as Economic Units
With
the increased autonomy accorded to LGUs, they now have the primary responsibility
for financing their respective programs and projects. Thus, local leaders
must not only be administrators and political technocrats but also accountable
and enterprising economic development managers. LGUs will be encouraged
to formulate their respective
local
economic agenda and promote favorable investment climate. They shall
commit to measurable performance targets to help realize the national
goals on increased productivity, employment generation and poverty reduction.
Towards this end, existing systems of measuring service delivery and
policy compliance shall continuously be refined and additional tools
measuring citizen satisfaction and overall development status of localities
shall be developed.
LGUs
will be trained, provided technical assistance and exposed to innovative
practices and approaches to development. Apart from planning and investment
programming, LGU skills in fund mobilization, budgeting and financial
management shall be strengthened so that local plan implementation could
bring about tangible results. Capacity-building programs will be designed
to enable them to practice greater fiscal discipline and improve revenue
collections. These will also be geared toward enhancing the creditworthiness
of LGUs and give them access to the capital markets.
National
government support shall be extended to supplement local resources.
For instance, official development assistance (ODA) will be tapped for
relending to qualified LGUs to finance their development programs and
projects. Grants for local development shall be identified and allocated
to low income LGUs. Furthermore, economic clustering and cooperative
undertakings among LGUs shall be encouraged to lower the cost of development
efforts to individual LGUs.
Building
up of Local Statistical Database
Planning
and decision making require timely, accurate and relevant information
at the local level. Immediate actions will be taken to shorten the time
lag and provide local-level disaggregation of social and economic indicators
such as the gross regional domestic product, regional poverty statistics
and human development index.
The
implementation of Executive Order (EO) 135, which provides for the establishment
of a well-coordinated statistical system at the local level will be
intensified. Focus will initially be on the setting up of statistical
coordination structures and mechanisms necessary in the development
of demand-driven local statistical data and indicators that aid in identifying
the needs of the poor.
Upgrading
of capacities of major statistical agencies and other data-generating
national government agencies and LGUs through training and technical
assistance will be supported. In addition, the organizational structure
of LGUs and government agencies will be enhanced to institutionalize
delivery of statistical services as among their major final outputs,
with provision of necessary resources.
To
ensure maximum access to information, statistical information centers
will be established in all regions of the country and other data dissemination
technologies that suit the needs and capabilities at the local levels
supported with necessary resources.

[ Chapter 10 ]
[ Chapter 11 ]
[ Chapter 12 ]
[ Chapter 13 ]
[ Chapter 14 ] [ Chapter 15 ]
[ PART I ]
[ Part II ]
[ Part III ]
[ Part IV ]
|