| |
FOREWORD |
| |
I. |
Planning
and Programming |
| |
|
A. |
Receipt
of Scholarship Offers |
| |
|
B. |
Interagency
Sectoral Consultation Meeting |
| |
|
C. |
Approval
of the Training Offers by the SCS |
| |
|
D. |
Programming
of Institutions/Courses |
| |
II. |
Processing
and Validation |
| |
|
A. |
Issuance
of Invitations to Target Beneficiaries/Institutions |
| |
|
B. |
Assessment
and Validation of Nominations |
| |
|
C. |
Release
of Preselection Results |
| |
|
D. |
Review
of Official Nomination Forms/Endorsement of
the Nomination Papers |
| |
|
E. |
Acceptance
of GOP Nominees |
| |
|
F.. |
Predeparture Activities |
| |
III. |
Monitoring
and Evaluation/Management Information System |
| |
|
A. |
Monitoring
of Scholars on Course |
| |
|
B. |
Assessment/Evaluation
of Country Programs |
| |
|
C. |
Data
Management and Information System |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
For over two decades now, the Special Committee Scholarship(SCS)
has pursued its mandate of coordinating ODA-
funded scholarships and training programs
to achieve the government's goal of generating
foreign technical assistance for institution-strengthening
and capability building.
A
set of policies and rules provides the direction
in the implementation of processes involved
in the availment of foreign scholarships and
trainings.. This set of policies and rules
is defined and articulated in this Handbook
of General Procedures, Rules and Regulations
in Planning, Programming, and Implementation
of ODA-funded Trainings and Scholarship for
the Information of Target Beneficiaries and
Clientele.
This
handbook represents one of a series of published
information on the SCS which the Scholarships
Affairs Secretariat(SAS) has initiated for
purposes of transparency and facility in the
overall process |
| |
|
| |
|
Planning
and Programming |
| |
|
The Planning exercise starts with the negotiation between the
Government of the Philippines (GOP) through
the Special Committee on Scholarships/(SCS)
and the representatives of donor governments
or between the SCS and the local representatives
of donor governments. The negotiations usually
concern the priority fields of study offered
by donor and the recipient country and the number
of slot allocations per year.
|
| |
|
A. |
Receipt
of Scholarship Offers |
| |
|
|
1.
SAS receives scholarship/training offers on
a goverment-to-goverment basis through the
Department of Foreign Affairs in a note verbale
the local embassy of the foreign donor. |
| |
|
|
2. The receiving clerk records all incoming offers for the
Executive Officer's (EO) information, notation
and/or instruction to concerned desk. |
| |
|
|
3. Desk makes initial evaluation on the training offers for
courses on the general administration and management.
Highly technical/specific courses are referred
to the sector staff of NEDA for evaluation in
accordance to relevance to course to the country's
priority thrusts, the financial terms, and the
donor's comparative advantage. The Desk shall
ensure that prioritized courses are gender-responsive. |
| |
|
|
4. Based on course evaluation, training offers considered as
relevant/responsive to the thrusts and priorities
of the Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan
are indexed and classified by development sector
(economic, social, etc.) in a matrix form. Other
salient information on the course, are indicated
in said matrix. The matrix serves as the key
sheet or working paper for every program. |
| |
|
|
5. Scholarships directly acquired from donor country and/or
donor institute are not administered/ endorsed
by the SCS, though sometimes these are referred
to the SCS Screening Committee for interview
(if the slot is to be sourced from any of the
current programs). |
| |
|
|
6. Desk submits courses offered to GOP to the Data Manager
for inputting to Foreign Scholarship Coordination
Information System (FSCIS). |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
B. |
Interagency
Sectoral Consultation Meeting |
| |
|
|
1. Forward planning is made annually prior to every country
program fiscal period through the interagency
sectoral and NEDA interstall consultation meetings.
These meetings are participated in by agency
directors, heads of foreign scholarship/training
committees or their deputies and the SAS desk
officers. The objective is to reconcile agency's
training needs with the Foreign Scholarships
and Training Program (FSTP) vis-à-vis gender-responsiveness
as the key approach for tapping the appropriate
beneficiaries. Consultation meeting accomplishes
two major objectives; viz (a) prompt and timely
information on the annual FSTP for dissemination
to target beneficiary institutions thereby facilitating
optimum responsive and availment; and (b) more
effective networking with target beneficiaries. |
| |
|
|
2. Institution transmits to SAS the list of courses of which
it has interest based on the FSTP offers. Institutions
which do not communicate are presumed to have
agreed on the list of institutions to be invited
in the program matrix. |
| |
|
|
3. Desk evaluates/incorporates into the program matrix al indicative
of the institutions on their respective agencies'
training needs. |
| |
|
|
4. Requests for participation are evaluated by the Desk and/or
NEDA sector staffs for possible inclusion in
the list of target beneficiaries. |
| |
|
|
5. Desk submits final list to Data Manager |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
C. |
Approval
of the Training Offers by the SCS |
| |
|
|
1. The final list of priority courses for GOP availment are
presented to the Scholarships Advisory Committee
(SAC), a subcommittee of the SCS for deliberation.
The SAC recommends to the SCS Executive Body
the list of priority courses for its approval. |
| |
|
|
2. A formal letter to the donor embassy containing GOP-proposed
courses addressed to DFA is signed and transmitted
by the SCS Chairman. |
| |
|
|
3. DFA transmits said communication to appropriate local embassies
for further transmittal to appropriate authorities
of the donor country. |
| |
|
|
4. Close coordination with the local embassies is maintained
by the Desk Officer for the smooth implementation
of the FSTP. |
| |
|
|
5. Desk Submits final output to the coordination activity with
local embassies to Data Manager. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
D. |
Programming
of Institutions/Courses |
| |
|
|
1. The EO and Desk review the results of the interagency consultation
meeting and finalizes the basic program matrix. |
| |
|
|
2. On the basis of evaluation, identified institutions to be
invited are listed in the program matrix. This
process also includes deletion of non-interested
institutions. |
| |
|
|
3. Institutions with pending nominations on the pipeline as
a result of the previous year over subscription
of slots are included among the programmable
institutions to avail for the particular fiscal
period. |
| |
|
|
4. Desk submits final data to Data Manager for updating of
Foreign Scholarships Coordination Information
System (FSCIS). |
| |
|
|
|
| |
II. |
Processing
and Validation |
| |
|
A. |
Issuance
of Invitations to Target Beneficiaries/Institutions |
| |
|
|
1. Invitations are issued to institutions or agencies programmed
by the deck and the EO based on identified institutions
to avail and other official requests for participation.
The number of invitations issued depends on
the number of slots available per course. Each
agency submit (1) candidate per course, unless
otherwise specified in the invitation letter. |
| |
|
|
2. Standard formats for invitation are adopted in all training
programs. There is the invitation for national
institutions; and there are those for the decentralized
preselection. |
| |
|
|
3. Invitations are addressed to the mother agency, copy furnished
the attached bureaus/regional offices concerned,
and " Attention: internal Committee on Scholarships/human
Resources Development Unit (HRDU)" of the institution. |
| |
|
|
4. Invitations for regular offered courses are disseminated
in advance, copy furnished the Regional Screening
Committee (RSC) and the HRDU of each agency,
initially through fax and original invitation
sent through delivery or mail (for Visayas and
Mindanao nominees). Follow-up by the Desk required.
Beneficiary institutions/agencies are expected
to respond immediately based on the list of
courses provided them during the sectoral consultation
per program. The SAS provides the RSC with a
monthly schedule of interviews which is basis
for the interview schedule for the Visayas and
Mindanao areas. |
| |
|
|
5. Invitations indicate the deadline for submission of documentary
requirements and the date of interview for nominees
who meet the minimum requirements. |
| |
|
|
6. Associations, councils and leagues from the government and
private sector maybe directly invited by SCS,
provided their nominees undergo the internal
preselection conducted by the nominating institutions. |
| |
|
|
7. The Desk coordinates closely with the Screening Coordinator
on the interview schedule. Interviews are rescheduled
for the following reasons: (a) natural calamity;
(b) short lead time on notice of interview or
a day before the date of interview (which requires
strong proof of late receipt of advice); (c)renominations
to a different program; and (d)availability
of additional slots as indicated by the donor
through the local embassy. |
| |
|
|
8. The Desk ensures that all communications relative to invitations
and requirements for preselection are cleared
with the EO prior to release. |
| |
|
|
9. Data are submitted to the ME/MISD for upgrading th FSCIS. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
B. |
Assessment
and Validation of Nominations |
| |
|
|
1. Documents required for the preselection are submitted to
the Desk Officer on the deadline indicated in
the invitation. |
| |
|
|
2. All nomination letters are addressed to either the SCS Chairman
or the Executive Officer and duly signed by
the head of the agency or its deputized official.
For LGUs, the signatory could be the incumbent
Governor or City Mayor but properly coordinated
with the local government academy (LGA); and
in the case of private sector/non-government
organization, head of the firm and/or organization. |
| |
|
|
3. All documentary requirements submitted must be up-to-date
and certified by the authorized issuing official. |
| |
|
|
4. Nominees with non-permanent status of appointment are required
to present a strong justification and guarantee
from the nominating institution of his/her continuity
of service after the training. No nominee with
non-permanent status will be interviewed or
screened without the justification from the
nominating agency. |
| |
|
|
5. The submission of the certificates of: (a) no pending nomination
in other local or foreign scholarships; and
(b) no outstanding service obligation form previous
trainings attended, are strictly enforced. |
| |
|
|
6. The Desk Officer conducts preliminary paper assessment of
the candidate to be interviewed. If the candidate
does not meet the minimum requirement of the
course, he will not be interviewed. Only principal
candidates are interviewed. Alternate candidates
are only interviewed when the principal candidate
is disqualified or withdraws his nomination
which is supported by an official withdrawal
letter from the nominating institution. replacement
of candidate is done immediately in case of
sudden withdrawal of nominations. This is feasible
only if donor embassies extend the deadline.
Government nominees with the rank o Director
IV or above are exempted from personal interview.
In the case of the private sector, presidents/managers
and chosen of equal rank are exempted from the
interview. |
| |
|
|
7. Assessment sheets must be duty signed by at least three
members of the Scholarships Screening Committee
(SSC)/Regional Screening Committee. If for strong
reasons only one member of the SSC conducts
the interview, assessment sheets are referred
to the other members of the SSC/RSC for their
confirmation. The signatures of at least three
(3) members of the SSC/RSC is a prerequisite
before nominations are officially endorsed to
the local embassy through the DFA. |
| |
|
|
8. In the case of candidates renominated to the same course/donor
country, the Desk Officer attached the previous
assessment sheet used when the candidate was
earlier evaluated. Candidates are required to
submit a renomination letter from the institution
together with an up-to-date GOP and donor requirements. |
| |
|
|
9. The SSC/RSC members and the Screening Coordinator record
the names of the interviews and the number of
interviews conducted for monitoring purposes. |
| |
|
|
10.Data are submitted to the ME/MISD for upgrading the FSCIS.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
C. |
Release
of Preselection Results |
| |
|
|
1. Assessment sheets should be duly signed by the legitimate
members of the SSC/RSC and the EO |
| |
|
|
2. Members of the screening panel, the concerned Desk Officer,
the Screening Coordinator, the EO and the SCS
members are exclusively authorized to have access
on the preselection results. |
| |
|
|
3. Only nominees who have passed the preselection process shall
be given official application forms. The Desk
requires completeness and neatness in accomplishing
the application form. Donor requirements are
required to be submitted on time. |
| |
|
|
4. The Desk always attaches a check-list of donor's requirements
on the application forms. The GOP and donor
requirements are explained by the Desk to the
qualified candidates. |
| |
|
|
5. The Desk assists the preselected candidates in accomplishing
official nomination forms. |
| |
|
|
6. The Desk sets the deadline for submission of donor's requirements
before the Embassy deadline. |
| |
|
|
7. The nominating institutions are provided with the preselection
results/status through an official form. Request
for data/information may only be allowed subject
to clearance from the EO. |
| |
|
|
8. Data are submitted to
the ME/MISD for updating the FSCIS. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
D. |
Review
of Official Nomination Forms/Endorsement of
the Nomination Papers |
| |
|
|
1. The Desk ensures completeness and neatness in the accomplished
forms and other pertinent documents. |
| |
|
|
2. Only complete and updated documents are endorsed to the
donor embassy. Late official nominations will
not be entertained unless the embassy indicates
that it has extended the deadline in which case
this should be indicated in a letter. |
| |
|
|
3. Other documentary requirements including medical examination
results are attached on the nomination forms.
Nominees from Metro Manila are required to undergo
medical examinations at the Department of Health
Infirmary or DOH retained hospitals; regional
candidates can have their medical examination
at the designated DOH regional health centers.
Only candidates who passed the physical and
medical examination conducted by DOH and its
retained hospitals are endorsed to the donor
government. Any false statement on medical and
physical examination either committed by the
physician or the nominee will cause automatic
disqualification of the nominee. Anomalies may
be further investigated. |
| |
|
|
4. A standard letter of endorsement is adopted. The accomplished
official nomination forms and other pertinent
documents are endorsed to the donor government
through the Department of Foreign Affairs. |
| |
|
|
5. The documents for endorsement to the donor embassies are
reviewed by the Desk and signed by the EO and/or
the chairman or his deputized official with
the SCS official seal. Only complete documents
are endorsed to the donor embassy. |
| |
|
|
6. Documents of all qualified nominees are altogether released
to the donor embassies to ensure early receipt.
Individual documentary endorsements may only
be allowed: (a) upon advice of donor for additional
nomination;(b) when the program is specific/special
to the institution and to the qualified candidate
where no prioritization is indicated; and (c)
for exceptional cases upon approval/clearance
from the EO. |
| |
|
|
7. Data are
submitted to the ME/MISD for updating the FSCIS. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
E. |
Acceptance
of GOP Nominees |
| |
|
|
1. Upon receipt of notice of acceptance (i.e.,
note verbale, notice of award) from donor, the
Desk immediately notifies the nominating agency
by telephone and/or official communication. |
| |
|
|
2. The staff assigned to assist the Desk must
immediately fax and/or release for delivery
for institution within Metro-Manila area) or
mailing (for provincial institution) the notice
of acceptance letter and its attachments. This
notice shall be the basis for issuing travel
order/authority signed by the grantee and the
nominating agency. |
| |
|
|
3. The Desk informs the scholar on documents
needed in applying for an official passport,
visa requirements, travel tax exemption, ticketing
instructions and setting of appointment for
the predeparture briefings at SAS/Embassy. |
| |
|
|
4. The desk regularly updates his/her respective
key sheets and submits the same to the Data
Manager of the SAS for updating of the relevant
information i.e., name, course and official
status of the scholar. |
| |
|
|
5. Data are submitted to the ME/MISD for updating
the FSCIS. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
F.. |
Predeparture Activities |
| |
|
|
1. The Desk briefs the scholar on the preparation
of other documents needed for his/her travel
as well as the training materials to be brought
to the program. |
| |
|
|
2. The Desk prepares and conducts pre-departure
briefing for each scholar. The briefing provides
the following: |
| |
|
|
|
a. information on: |
| |
|
|
|
|
a.1. country of destination i.e., language, history,
currency, climate, etc. |
| |
|
|
|
|
a.2. details of training program to be attached; |
| |
|
|
|
|
a.3. conduct and behavior of the scholar while
on training; |
| |
|
|
|
|
a.4. itinerary of level and arrival details in
country of training (if provided by Embassy/Donor); |
| |
|
|
|
|
a.5. reminder
to the scholar to report his/her presence to
the Philippine Consulate/Embassy where training
program is to be conducted; |
| |
|
|
|
b. availability of a national dress
and suitable clothing for temperature
countries; |
| |
|
|
|
c. submission of post-training report
to SCS/ NEDA and nominating institution; |
| |
|
|
|
d. reminder
to the scholar to report his/her presence to
the Philippine Consulate/Embassy where the training
program is to be conducted. |
| |
|
|
3. The Desk likewise provides a copy of the SCS
pre-departure briefing guidelines to the scholar.
The scholar is expected to go over the guidelines.
He is advised to attend the pre-departure briefing
at the local embassy on other details of his
travel and award. |
| |
|
|
4. The Desk monitors the scholar's flow of documents
from request for issuance of official passport,
travel tax exemption and ticketing to actual
departure. |
| |
|
|
5. Data are submitted to the ME/MISD for upgrading
FSCIS. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
III. |
Monitoring
and Evaluation/Management Information System |
| |
|
A. |
Monitoring
of Scholars on Course |
| |
|
|
1. The Desk maintains
a life copy of each scholar's foreign travel
order and duly accomplished scholarship training
contract. |
| |
|
|
2. The Desk evaluates and facilitates action
on request of scholar for the extension of validity
of passports. transfer to another course and/or
another institution, extension of training period
and travel of family members to the country
of training with the local donor embassy and
mother agency/institution of the scholar with
the following considerations: |
| |
|
|
|
2.a. Validity of passport is based on the length
of training; |
| 2.b. Transfer to another course outside of the
original award or to another institution could
only be effected upon issuance by the SCS
of an official communication to the local embassy
on said transfer |
| 2.c.
Extension of award may only be allowed for very
strong reasons like natural calamities affecting
completion of thesis or SCS of an official
communication to the local embassy on said transfer; |
| 2.d. Travel of family members to the scholar's
country of training may only be allowed if it
is within the terms of reference of the grant
as provided for by the donor country |
| 2.e. No scholar is allowed to apply for another
award from another institutions in the donor
country while on course; |
| |
|
|
3. The Desk evaluates performance report (s)
of the scholar submitted by the training institution
and sends one copy to the mother agency/institution
of the scholar. |
| |
|
|
4. The Desk evaluates the post training reports
of scholars and substantive ideas are inputted
in the status report prepared for country sectoral
consultation. These are used especially for
planning purposes and for future acceptance
of program offers; |
| |
|
|
5. The Desk continuously updates his/her respective
program key sheets and submits to the Data Manager
of the FSCIC for updating of the final status
of the scholar and training course viability. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
B. |
Assessment/Evaluation of Country Programs |
| |
|
|
1. The Desk, through the EO, consults the NEDA
sector Staff, if necessary, on each scholar's
report of training course attended. The Sector
Staff may recommend continuation/discontinuation
of availment of such training course; |
| |
|
|
|